Are we at the beginning of a new political era in British politics, where Labour represent the middle-class and The Conservatives represent Northern workers?

Yes I know the title of this piece sounds bizarre, in particular The Conservatives being a party of the Northern working-class, but just bear with me and listen to what i’ve got to say.

First lets talk about the rise of populism:

There is no denying that we are now in a new era of populist politics where the status quo of the political elite governing without being held to account by ordinary people is long gone.

I think the main reason for this is because of the rise of alternative and social media at the expense of the remainstream media. The BBC will soon be long gone once the overton window moves to common-sense and with it we see the failure of the Guardian fuelled anti-British champagne socialist London bubble propaganda.

The fact that ordinary people aren’t falling for the Biased Broadcasting Corporation’s fake news anymore, along with the lame tactics from the rest of the smear merchants on mainstream TV means that the establishment was defeated twice in the West with victories to Donald Trump and Brexit.

That’s old news but I mention it because obviously there is no longer a divide between left and right-wing, instead we have globalism and nationalism.

Now, the former half of the title of this post is a lot more plain to see than the latter, i.e. the Conservatives have still not yet had enough time to show us whether or not they will take the opportunity of solidating the Northern working-class vote which was only loaned to them by voters in Labour safe seats.

So as for the Labour Party… well what an absolute shit storm they find themselves in. They lost the Northern working-class vote at the last election in dramatic style and tbh that’s been coming ever since Tony Bliar was Prime Minister. At the start of Bliar’s first term the Northern working-class were still loyal to Labour, and Tony Bliar repaid that loyalty by opening the doors to mass-migration on the grounds that immigrants would cram themselves into working-class communities. Furthermore, if the indigenous working-class complained about this then they would be labelled racist bigots.

After the centre-left era of Brown, Blair and Miliband, Labour moved back to the far-left. However this was not to redeem their mistake of betraying the Northern working-class faithful, this was to attract a new modern type of voter- the young middle-class university wankers.

The YMCUW were typically from Oxfordshire or Gloucestershire. They have double barrelled second names, they study social sciences at a metropolitan university and they’ve always wanted to be different to their Conservative voting parents. Back at home they were touched by a tv commercial on their multi-screen Sky TV package showing the troubles of Syrian refugees. They are virtue signallers.

You can’t blame young middle-class university wankers for falling in love with the idea of socialism. We’ve all done it at a young age including me before I was red pilled. It is going to be near enough impossible for the next generation to get on the property ladder and it is obviously easiest to blame capitalism for that.

Since Corbynism and the far-left Labour have moved back to the centre-left with Sir Keir Starmer. Sir Keir was the best of a bad bunch regarding the recent Labour leadership contest. But still he is not representative of the Northern working-class being another Islington twat and a staunch remained who wanted a second referendum.

Perhaps Labour have ditched the working-class altogether because the working-class are no longer as plain to see in society anymore. There was a time when the working-class were British society’s largest class grouping. Now according to Tony Bliar- “there is no longer a working-class everyone is middle-class”. I wouldn’t go that far but the working-class are definitely not as prominent.

Traditionally in a broader sense Labour has always been the party of poor people and the Conservatives the party of the rich (meaning that it has always been in Labour’s interest to stop the poor from getting rich). However because of the decline in the working-class social group Labour now pursue votes from young middle-class university wankers (and immigrants).

On the other hand, look how the Conservatives have come from nowhere to take former mining constituencies in the North. They are now holding seats in Wakefield for the first time in nearly 90 years and Blyth Valley for the first time in 70 years. What an opportunity this is for the Conservatives and hopefully at the next election my hometown of Barnsley will vote Conservative for the first time ever.


Diane Abbott would not get away with her Controversies if she was White

Diane Abbott has a had a successful career enjoying the luxuries of a middle-class life that is found amongst the political elite. Despite her living with the joys of being a politician, she has based her career on being a voice for the ethnic minorities and a campaigner for race equality. With this has come many controversies, although the extent of the controversies is of course debatable. You may feel that Diane Abbott has been subject to unnecessary negative attention from a right-wing media, after all, the controversies I am about to highlight to you are mainly found in reports from media outlets such as the Telegraph and the Daily Mail. But whilst I highlight Abbott’s mishaps, ask yourself “would a white politician get away with doing that?”

The first naive moment of Abbott’s career I am going to highlight is when she generalised all white people as being the same. She posted a tweet on twitter stating that “white people love to play divide and rule”, with the hashtag “tactics as old as colonialism”. By this she is referring to modern day white people being the same as certain people in colonial times when empires, such as Great Britain, divided and subjected people to their rule depending on their race. This tweet is ludicrous and laughable from Diane Abbott seen as we now live in the 21st century, and people of all races living in Diane Abbott’s country enjoy the freedoms of a democracy. But with that tweet, Abbott generalised all 52 million white people living in Britain as being the same. Or maybe it was all 1.2 billion white people living in the world who love to play divide and rule, she didn’t make it quite clear. However imagine if it was a white politician generalising black people as of loving to play divide and rule, or as of loving to do a ‘more suited’ black stereotype (I’m not going to give an example because the PC will throw the racist card at me, I’m probably already pushing the limit).

Diane Abbott apologised for her tweet, but only because her leader Ed Miliband made her, she wasn’t going to! She got away with it not being forced to resign because she is a black politician generalising white people, not a white politician generalising black people.

The next point I’d like to highlight concerning Diane Abbott’s prejudice against white people is a Labour Party bill board seen in her constituency of Hackney North and Stoke Newington.


This Labour Party billboard was being used in the campaign for re-electing Diane Abbott. Two problems with this billboard. One, The 9 people pictured on the billboard including Diane Abbott are all black (so much for the promotion of diversity and multiculturalism by the Labour Party). Two, the quote on the billboard, “Labour will put BLACK AND ETHNIC FAMILIES FIRST to preserve a diverse nation”. The 9 only black people on the billboard goes completely against the diversity of British people that ethnic minorities, such as Diane Abbott, are known for stressing the importance of. Utter hypocrite! Of course Diane Abbott would argue that this such billboard is only being used in order to appeal to the electorate in Hackney, seen as 65% of people living in Hackney are black or of ethnic minority. However imagine if Gavin Felton, UKIP candidate for Barnsley, campaigned with a billboard picturing 9 white only people. It would get absolutely slaughtered by the left-wing media and liberals on social media. This despite 98% of people living in Barnsley being white. He’d only be appealing to the electorate.

The third highlight of Diane Abbott’s joke of a political career I would like to raise, again concerns her actions on twitter. I’d just like to say that after studying politics for 6 years, this was the first time a politician has actually made me angry with what he/she has said. This issue concerns the three recent terror attacks in Manchester, London Bridge and Finsbury Park; two of those terror attacks carried out by Islamic extremists and one by an Islamophobic extremist. When Abbott took to twitter after the terror attacks by Islamic extremists in Manchester and London Bridge, she highlighted both terror attacks merely as ‘incidents’. However she outlined the attack by an Islamophobic extremist in Finsbury Pack as an actual ‘terrorist attack’. Why were the two attacks in Manchester and London Bridge only ‘incidents’ and the attack in Finsbury Park an actual ‘terrorist attack’ Diane Abbott? I’d like you to imagine a white politician of a right-wing political party, perhaps known for being against immigration, highlighting the attacks in Manchester and London Bridge as ‘terrorist attacks’ but the attack in Finsbury Park merely an ‘incident’. Again, he/she would get absolutely slaughtered by left-wing media and liberals on social media.

Of course I emailed Abbott a few days prior to writing this article to give her the chance to explain why she differentiated the three terrorist attacks. As you might have expected, she didn’t reply!


As you could imagine, the race related controversies seen from Diane Abbot would have been criticised more if it was the other way round with a white politician. Diane Abbott has benefited an incredible amount throughout her political career from the fact that she is black. Ironic that. I am not saying that she gets away with everything, she has often been seen apologising for her actions. But a white politician in her shoes would have been sent to the job centre a very long time ago. It is not only race related issues concerning Diane Abbott’s laughable career, but other mishaps seen from her, for example the hypocrisy seen when she criticised colleagues Tony Bliar and Harriet Harman for sending their kids to private schools. She later sent her own son to a private school. And of course the car crash interview just last month when Abbot got her figures all wrong, her excuse being that she’d been busy and stressed with 6 interviews already that morning (I’d expect her to successfully complete a 1000 interviews in a morning with the money that she earns). This of course led to her stepping down from the shadow cabinet a couple of days later.

I’m surprised a politician prone to controversy like her is able to hold a position as high as on the shadow cabinet in parliament (she’s now returned to the shadow cabinet). Anyone would think that she and her leader Jeremy Corbyn had a special connection like some sort of previous sexual history.

Oh hang on a minute…

To summarise, the ironic fact is the only reason Diane Abbott has not been forced to resign from her numerous positions in parliament is because she is a black female. Political correctness has gone mad, and the essential need to not offend and give priority to the social minorities is wrong, proven by the fact that Diane Abbott gets away with everything that she says and does.